Someone please pass the dramamine…
Just when you think the political turbulence on the conflict minerals rule is over, we fly right into another storm.
Yesterday, Senator Elizabeth Warren, along with Senators Sherrod Brown, Robert Menendez and Brian Schatz, submitted a pointed letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission Inspector General Carl Hoecker asking for an investigation into recent actions taken by Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Acting Chairman Michael Piwowar. One of the actions Senator Warren wants reviewed is the January 31, 2017 statement from the Acting Chairman directing the staff to reconsider the conflict minerals rule.
Key excerpts from her letter are below.
Commissioner Piwowar evidently required reconsideration of the guidance on this congressionally mandated rule- which concerns disclosures about conflict minerals originating from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries – based exclusively on stories he heard while “visiting Africa last year.” Commissioner Piwowar claims to have “heard first-hand from the people affected by this misguided rule,” and asserts that the rule is putting mining operators out of business while potentially undermining U.S. national security interests.
Commissioner Piwowar has long disliked this required rule, calling it “yet another situation where politically-connected special interests are using shareholder resources to push their own agenda.” But Commissioner Piwowar’s personal distaste for a congressional mandate is not sufficient grounds to attempt to weaken a final rule that has been approved by the SEC. We are also concerned that Commissioner Piwowar appears to have directed the agency staff to undertake this review before consulting with his only fellow Commissioner and seeking her approval.
At his confirmation hearing, SEC Chair-nominee Jay Clayton testified that he … had no specific plans to revisit any Dodd-Frank- mandated rules.
Commissioner Piwowar has “exert[ed] unusual authority for an acting agency chair,” We ask that you conduct an investigation into each of these decisions to determine whether they are legally permissible… we ask you specifically investigate the following: …
Did Commissioner Piwowar provide a valid substantive justification for these changes?
Did Commissioner Piwowar provide adequate public notice and comment periods, and did he follow all required SEC guidelines and rules for taking action, including the SEC’s quorum requirements?
Is Commissioner Piwowar carrying out these actions at his own initiative, or has he consulted with, or received direction from, anyone within or outside the Administration?
We will continue to monitor this situation – and will stock up on dramamine. We’ll try to get enough to share.